We were asked by a client why it takes longer to translate contracts, especially complicated ones longer to produce a contract in certain languages than others.

The main reason for the difference in time between producing a cross-border contract in English and Spanish versus Arabic or Mandarin comes down to the complexity of the language and the need for precise legal translations. Here's a breakdown of why it can take longer:

1. Language Complexity: Arabic and Mandarin are more structurally complex than Spanish or English, especially when it comes to legal terminology. This means that translating a contract into these languages requires additional care to ensure clarity and precision, particularly for legal terms and industry-specific jargon.
2. Writing Systems: Arabic uses a different script and has right-to-left text direction, while Mandarin uses characters rather than an alphabet. These writing systems require different formatting rules and software compatibility, which can add time to the process.
3. Cultural and Legal Nuances: Contracts often need to be adapted to the legal systems and cultural expectations of the target country. Translating into Arabic or Mandarin often involves more localized adjustments to ensure the contract is enforceable and understood within the respective legal frameworks. This step adds complexity and time, as it may require further consultation with legal experts who are familiar with the specific requirements of those regions.
4. Resource Availability: There are simply more resources readily available in English and Spanish due to the high volume of international transactions in these languages. For Arabic and Mandarin, there may be fewer pre-existing templates or legal databases to draw from, making the process more manual and time-consuming.

By comparison, Spanish is closer to English in terms of legal and grammatical structure, making it easier and quicker to produce.

Importance of Legal Nuances in Drafting Cross-Border Contracts

Legal nuances differ across languages and jurisdictions due to a variety of factors, such as the legal system, culture, historical context, and interpretation of legal principles. Here's a deeper look at how legal nuances differ, particularly when dealing with languages like Arabic, Mandarin, English, and Spanish:

1. Legal Systems

• Common Law vs. Civil Law:
• English-speaking countries (e.g., U.S., UK) often follow common law systems where case law (precedent) plays a central role. Contracts in these jurisdictions tend to be very detailed to avoid ambiguity, as future disputes may rely heavily on court interpretations.
• Spanish-speaking countries (e.g., Spain, much of Latin America) follow civil law systems derived from Roman law, which rely more on codified statutes. Contracts may be shorter, as they often refer to established legal codes.
• Mandarin-speaking countries (e.g., China, Taiwan) operate largely under civil law systems with strong government influence in commercial law. Contracts often need to account for governmental regulations and approvals more explicitly.
• Arabic-speaking countries often follow a hybrid of civil law, common law, and Sharia (Islamic law). Depending on the country, contracts may need to conform to Sharia principles, particularly in areas like finance, trade, or personal law.

2. Interpretation of Terms

• Arabic: In Arabic-speaking countries, especially those influenced by Sharia law, certain contract terms may need to be adjusted. For example:
• Interest (riba): Charging interest on loans is prohibited under Islamic finance. Any contract dealing with financial transactions may need to comply with these rules, meaning that traditional interest-bearing contracts would be restructured to use profit-sharing or leasing arrangements.
• Uncertainty (gharar): Contracts involving significant uncertainty or speculation (such as certain insurance or investment products) may be considered invalid under Islamic law.
• Mandarin: In China, legal terms may be influenced by cultural and governmental norms. For instance:
• Force majeure: Chinese contracts often include detailed force majeure clauses that allow for flexibility in cases where government intervention (e.g., new regulations, natural disasters) affects the ability to perform the contract.
• Good faith: The concept of "good faith" may be emphasized differently in Chinese law compared to Western law, with an expectation that parties cooperate and adjust to changes in circumstances.
• Spanish: In civil law systems common in Spanish-speaking countries, contracts are often briefer because they assume adherence to a set of codified legal principles. However:
• Formality requirements: Some contracts must be notarized or follow specific legal formalities, such as when dealing with real estate or inheritance law, which differs from the common law practice of informal agreements.

3. Cultural Expectations

• Arabic: In many Arab countries, contracts tend to be more formal and may reflect cultural values such as family ties, trust, and mutual respect. While the written contract is important, personal relationships and verbal agreements often play a significant role in the negotiation process.
• Mandarin: In Chinese culture, "guanxi" (personal relationships and networks) is often just as important as the written contract itself. Business contracts in China may reflect these relational expectations and focus on cooperation over long-term relationships rather than strict adherence to a contract’s letter.
• Spanish: Many Spanish-speaking countries emphasize clarity and brevity in legal documents, and certain social expectations may influence contract drafting, such as an emphasis on fairness and mutual benefit.

4. Legal Terms and Concepts that Don’t Translate Easily

• Arabic: Some legal concepts in Arabic do not have direct equivalents in English or other languages. For instance, legal terms derived from Sharia law, such as "ijara" (lease) or "mudarabah" (partnership), have specific meanings that require precise translation to capture the underlying legal principles.
• Mandarin: Chinese legal language often includes specific terms that are difficult to translate directly. For example, the concept of "liability" or "responsibility" may be nuanced by how it is expressed in Chinese law (e.g., corporate responsibility can be tightly regulated by state policies).
• Spanish: While Spanish legal terms generally have direct English equivalents due to the commonality of civil law systems, terms like "usufructo" (right to use and enjoy property) or "resolución de contrato" (contract resolution) may carry subtle differences in legal implications compared to their English counterparts.

5. Legal Formalities and Procedures

• Arabic: Contracts in Arabic-speaking countries might require more attention to religious law and the approval of religious authorities in certain areas, such as family law, inheritance, or financial matters. These additional steps can add complexity to drafting and executing contracts.
• Mandarin: In China, contracts often need to be filed with or approved by government bodies, especially in regulated industries like energy, telecommunications, or foreign investments. This requirement means that contracts must be drafted to meet not only the legal standards but also regulatory and political expectations.
• Spanish: In many Spanish-speaking jurisdictions, contracts may need to be notarized or follow specific local protocols, particularly in real estate or inheritance cases. This means that contracts must be adapted to fit these local legal norms and procedures.

6. Contractual Remedies

• Arabic: Remedies available in Arabic legal contracts may be influenced by the Islamic principles of fairness and avoiding harm. For example, in the case of breach of contract, the remedy might focus more on compensation for actual losses rather than punitive damages, which might be deemed inappropriate under Islamic law.
• Mandarin: In China, enforcement of contracts can be challenging due to the role of government authorities. While contracts typically include dispute resolution clauses, such as arbitration or mediation, enforcement can be influenced by the government’s stance on the specific industry or the parties involved.
• Spanish: In civil law systems, remedies for breach of contract are often codified in the legal system, which may make it simpler to predict outcomes. However, different countries may have unique processes for pursuing these remedies, and judicial processes in some Latin American countries can be slower than in others.

Conclusion:

These legal nuances can significantly impact the drafting of cross-border contracts. Legal translation and adaptation are not just about translating words but also about interpreting legal concepts in a way that aligns with local laws, cultural expectations, and regulatory frameworks. This is why contracts in Arabic or Mandarin might take longer to draft or adapt compared to English or Spanish versions—each requires deep consideration of these layers of legal and cultural context.

Ensure your cross-border contracts are not only translated but also expertly adapted to local legal and cultural requirements. At JPS Global Advisors and Consultant, we specialize in providing precise, legally sound translations across a wide range of languages, including English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Arabic. Whether your business is navigating international trade or securing compliance with local regulations, our team is ready to help you avoid costly misinterpretations and ensure enforceability. Contact us today for a consultation and let us support your global expansion with expert contract services.

Call us at 1 (214) 227-2383 or email at info@jpsglobaladvisorsandconsultant.com

Navigating Complexity, Delivering Success